4.7 Article

An Improved Variable Kernel Density Estimator Based on L2 Regularization

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 9, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math9162004

关键词

probability density function; kernel density estimation; Parzen window; bandwidth; kernel function

资金

  1. Basic Research Foundation of Strengthening Police with Science and Technology of the Ministry of Public Security [2017GABJC09]
  2. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Impression Evidence Examination and Identification Technology, The Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China [HJKF201901]
  3. Basic Research Foundation of Shenzhen [20210312191246002]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Shenzhen University [2018060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposed an improved variable KDE (IVKDE) method, which can determine the optimal bandwidth for each data point based on the integrated squared error (ISE) criterion. Compared with fixed KDE (FKDE) and variable KDE (VKDE), IVKDE achieved lower estimation errors.
The nature of the kernel density estimator (KDE) is to find the underlying probability density function (p.d.f) for a given dataset. The key to training the KDE is to determine the optimal bandwidth or Parzen window. All the data points share a fixed bandwidth (scalar for univariate KDE and vector for multivariate KDE) in the fixed KDE (FKDE). In this paper, we propose an improved variable KDE (IVKDE) which determines the optimal bandwidth for each data point in the given dataset based on the integrated squared error (ISE) criterion with the L-2 regularization term. An effective optimization algorithm is developed to solve the improved objective function. We compare the estimation performance of IVKDE with FKDE and VKDE based on ISE criterion without L-2 regularization on four univariate and four multivariate probability distributions. The experimental results show that IVKDE obtains lower estimation errors and thus demonstrate the effectiveness of IVKDE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据