4.7 Article

Shock wave and bubble characteristics of underwater array explosion of charges

期刊

DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 1445-1453

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.05.020

关键词

Explosion mechanics; Underwater explosion; Array explosion; Shock wave; Bubble

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the effect of underwater explosion parameters on the multi-point array explosion. Shock wave and bubble parameters of aggregate charge, two charges, and four charges were measured through underwater explosion tests, and their influence on the explosion power field in terms of charge quantity and array distance was analyzed.
In this study, we focused on the effect of the underwater explosion parameters of multi-point array explosion. The shock wave and bubble parameters of aggregate charge, two charges, and four charges were measured through an underwater explosion test, and their influence on the explosion power field of charge quantity and array distance was analyzed. Results show that the multi-shock wave collision of array explosion can be approximated to a linear superposition, and the interaction of delayed shock wave can be deemed as the increase of the shock wave baseline. Shock wave focusing and delayed super-position increase the shock wave peak pressure. Compared with the aggregate charge, the greater the number of array explosion points is, the higher the impulse and the gain of the bubble peak pressure are. At the same array distance, the smaller the charge quantity is, the higher the bubble impulse will be. At the same charge quantity, the smaller the array distance is, the higher the bubble impulse will be. The bubble period decreases gradually with the increase of the charge quantity, but the test orientation has little effect on the bubble period. (c) 2021 China Ordnance Society. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据