4.7 Article

Optimisation of a Diesel-Electric Ship Propulsion and Power Generation System Using a Genetic Algorithm

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9060587

关键词

ship propulsion; ship design; genetic algorithm; optimisation; electric propulsion; energy efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an optimal design approach for diesel-electric propulsion systems, using a genetic algorithm to determine the best engine configuration and load sharing strategy. The method aims to minimize fuel consumption and meet power and speed requirements, showcasing the flexibility and efficiency of diesel-electric propulsion.
In recent decades, the design of ship propulsion systems has been focusing on energy efficiency and low pollutant emissions. In this framework, diesel-electric propulsion has become a standard for many ship types and has proven its worth for flexible propulsion design and management. This paper presents an approach to the optimal design of diesel-electric propulsion systems, minimising the fuel consumption while meeting the power and speed requirements. A genetic algorithm performs the optimisation, used to determine the number and type of engines installed on-board and the engines' design speed and power, selecting within a dataset of four-stroke diesel engines. The same algorithm is then adapted and applied to determine the optimal load sharing strategy in off-design conditions, taking advantage of the high flexibility of the diesel-electric propulsion plants. In order to apply the algorithm, the propulsion layout design is formulated as an optimisation problem, translating the system requirements into a cost function and a set of linear and non-linear constraints. Eventually, the method is applied to a case study vessel: first, the optimal diesel-electric propulsion plants are determined, then the optimal off-design load sharing and working conditions are computed. AC and DC network solutions are compared and critically discussed in both design and off-design conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据