4.7 Article

Numerical Study on Interaction between Submarine Landslides and a Monopile Using CFD Techniques

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9070736

关键词

computational fluid dynamics; drag force; flow height; monopile; submarine landslide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978399, 51679134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Offshore installations with pile foundations in shallow water are at risk of submarine landslides, causing damage to engineering facilities, loss of life, and loss of money. A study using ANSYS Fluent 20.0 developed a three-dimensional biphasic numerical model to analyze the interaction between monopiles and submarine landslides, proposing two modes of interactional forces acting on the monopile.
Offshore installations with pile foundations in shallow water are vulnerable to submarine landslides, which cause serious damage to engineering facilities, loss of life, and loss of money. Due to a shortage of real observation data and the difficulty of reproduction, we lack insight into the interaction behavior between submarine landslides and monopiles. This study capitalized on ANSYS Fluent 20.0 to develop a three-dimensional biphasic (water and slurry) numerical model. This CFD model was used to analyze the interaction between a monopile and submarine landslides at different flow heights. The velocities of submarine landslides were from low to high values. Two modes of interactional forces acting on the monopile are proposed, which are (i) interaction force with peak value and (ii) interaction force without peak value. The influence of flow height and velocity on interaction forces was investigated. Results show that the effect of the flow heights on the interaction force is significant at low velocity stage, while the peak force representing a hazard level of the pile was non-negligible under high flow velocity and low flow height conditions, which should be considered in a future study. The related mechanisms are revealed with a hybrid model considering different components of the force.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据