4.7 Article

COLREGs Compliant Fuzzy-Based Collision Avoidance System for Multiple Ship Encounters

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse9080790

关键词

collision avoidance; fuzzy logic; decision making; multiple ships; MATLAB simulink

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE)
  2. Research University Grant-UTM ER [Q.J130000.3851.19J33]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel Fuzzy-logic based intelligent conflict detection and resolution algorithm for marine traffic, which analyzes collision courses and possible avoiding actions by considering ship motion dynamics. The algorithm makes decisions for collision avoidance based on Collision Risk values and relative angles of each ship.
As the number of ships for marine transportation increases with the advancement of global trade, encountering multiple ships in marine traffic becomes common. This situation raises the risk of collision of the ships; hence, this paper proposes a novel Fuzzy-logic based intelligent conflict detection and resolution algorithm, where the collision courses and possible avoiding actions are analysed by considering ship motion dynamics and the input and output fuzzy membership functions are derived. As a conflict detection module, the Collision Risk (CR) is measured for each ship by using a scaled nondimensional Distance to the Closest Point of Approach (DCPA) and Time to the Closest Point of Approach (TCPA) as inputs. Afterwards, the decisions for collision avoidance are made based on the calculated CR, encountering angle and relative angle of each ship measured from others. In this regard, the rules for the Fuzzy interface system are defined in accordance with the COLREGs, and the whole system is implemented on the MATLAB Simulink platform. In addition, to deal with the multiple ship encounters, the paper proposes a unique maximum-course and minimum-speed change approach for decision making, which has been found to be efficient to solve Imazu problems, and other complicated multiple-ship encounters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据