4.6 Article

Exploratory tritium breeding performance study on a water cooled lead ceramic breeder blanket for EU DEMO using Serpent-2

期刊

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2021.101050

关键词

Water cooled Lead Ceramic Breeder; Neutronics; Tritium breeding; Serpent-2

资金

  1. National Key Research, Development Program of China [2017YFE0301501, 2017YFE0301305]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201806340163]
  3. Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 and 2019-2020 [633053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Innovative water-cooled lead ceramic breeder blanket concepts are being developed at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology to explore alternative options for the European demonstration fusion power plant. Research also indicates that water-cooled blankets need to improve tritium breeding capacity to meet the vital function of tritium self-sufficiency.
Innovative Water cooled Lead Ceramic Breeder (WLCB) blanket concepts are being developed at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) to explore alternative options for the European demonstration fusion power plant (DEMO). Compared to the Helium Cooled Pebble Bed blanket (HCPB, which is one of the two driver blanket concepts of the European DEMO), Lead/ Lead-alloy is used as neutron multiplier instead of Be/Be-alloy and pressurized subcooled water is used as coolant instead of Helium in the WLCB. The tritium self-sufficiency is the vital function that a Breeding Blanket has to achieve. The absorption of neutrons by water leads to a decrease in the number of neutrons, so the requirement to improve the tritium breeding capacity of the water-cooled blankets is particularly prominent. The Monte Carlo neutron transport code Serpent-2 developed by VTT in Finland has already been benchmarked to be applicable to neutronics calculations in the fusion reactors in a previous study. In this paper, an exploratory TBR study on Water cooled Lead Ceramic Breeder Blanket is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据