4.7 Article

The effect of chloride ingress in reinforced geopolymer concrete exposed in the marine environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102281

关键词

Durability; Marine environment; Geopolymer concrete; Diffusion coefficient; Pore characteristics

资金

  1. CRC for Low Carbon Living Ltd - Cooperative Research Centres program, an Australian Government initiative [RP1020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the durability of slag-based geopolymer concrete in the marine environment and finds that it has lower resistance to chloride penetration compared to ordinary Portland Cement concrete. The study also shows that the microstructural changes due to chloride attack in the geopolymer concrete differ from those in the OPC concrete.
Determining the durability of geopolymer materials in a real field environment is important to enhance the feasibility of their use in concrete production.. This paper investigates the durability of slag-based geopolymer concrete (SGPC-M) exposed in the spray/splash zone of the marine environment. Properties of SGPC-M in the marine environment including chloride resistance, absorption characteristics, and the scaling effect were examined and compared with ordinary Portland Cement concrete (OPC-M) properties in the same environment. The test results indicate that the SGPC-M has a lower resistance to chloride penetration than the OPC-M concrete. Compared to the OPC-M, higher values of diffusion coefficient and lower values of chloride binding capacity were obtained for the SGPC-M concrete. Besides, the study on the pore characteristics and absorption behaviour of the concrete indicates that the SGPC-M possesses more pores than the OPC-M, which is related to the lower resistance to chloride penetration in the marine environment. Furthermore, the microstructural changes due to chloride attack in the SGPC-M are different than the changes in the OPC-M concrete, which was identified from the SEM and XRD analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据