4.7 Article

Seismic analysis of 3D active earth pressure for unsaturated backfill

期刊

TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100593

关键词

Active earth pressure coefficient; Unsaturated soils; 3D failure mechanism; Seismic effect

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2021zzts0763]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new procedure is proposed to evaluate active earth pressure in 3D unsaturated backfills subjected to earthquake vibration through upper bound analysis. The impact of water tables on soil-wall stability is indirectly considered, with parametric studies investigating various influences on the retaining wall. The explicit expression of seismic active earth pressure is derived by energy dissipation principle, showing good agreement with previous literature.
A new procedure is proposed for evaluating active earth pressure subjected to earthquake vibration for three-dimensional (3D) unsaturated backfills comprised of cohesive soils, which is conducted by developing an upper bound analysis. The impact of diverse water tables on unsaturated soil-wall stability is incorporated into the comprehensive analysis, and it turns out to be indirect by exerting influence on pore-water pressure and matric suction. A 3D horn-like failure mode is adopted to characterize the collapse of unsaturated backfills. The explicit expression of seismic active earth pressure can be derived by the principle of energy dissipation, where the seismic effect is assembled into the present study as a uniformly distributed inertia force. Comparison results with previously published literature show good agreement. Parametric studies are further performed to investigate the influences of several parameters on the retaining wall. This approach provides a useful tool for reflecting the true response behaviors of critical failure mechanism and evaluating the stability of unsaturated cohesive backfills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据