4.6 Review

The Role of EUS and EUS-FNA in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Gallbladder Lesions

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091586

关键词

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS); EUS fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA); gallbladder carcinoma; xanthogranulomatous; cholecystitis gallbladder lesions

资金

  1. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [31-A-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has increased spatial resolution compared to other imaging modalities and is essential for evaluating gallbladder lesions and suspected gallbladder cancer. EUS-FNA can provide precise diagnoses and differentiate between benign and malignant conditions. Advancements in NGS technology allow for potential predictive genomic biomarkers to be identified for treatment response in gallbladder cancer.
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has greater spatial resolution than other diagnostic imaging modalities. In addition, if gallbladder lesions are found and gallbladder cancer is suspected, EUS is an indispensable modality, enabling detailed tests for invasion depth evaluation using the Doppler mode and ultrasound agents. Furthermore, for gallbladder lesions, EUS fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can be used to differentiate benign and malignant forms of conditions, such as xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, and collect evidence before chemotherapy. EUS-FNA is also useful for highly precise and specific diagnoses. However, the prevention of bile leakage, an accidental symptom, is highly important. Advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies facilitate the application of multiple parallel sequencing to EUS-FNA samples. Several biomarkers are expected to stratify treatment for gallbladder cancer; however, NGS can unveil potential predictive genomic biomarkers for the treatment response. It is believed that NGS may be feasible with samples obtained using EUS-FNA, further increasing the demand for EUS-FNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据