4.6 Article

Assessment of the Adaptive Force of Elbow Extensors in Healthy Subjects Quantified by a Novel Pneumatically Driven Measurement System with Considerations of Its Quality Criteria

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060923

关键词

adaptive force; neuromuscular functionality; sensorimotor control; isometric muscle action; eccentric muscle action; maximal voluntary contraction; adaptive holding capacity; reliability; validity

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. University of Potsdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the adaptability of the neuromuscular system to external forces by measuring force and limb position during the application of increasing external force. It found that the maximal isometric and maximal eccentric Adaptive Force are specific and independent parameters of muscle function compared to other maximal forces.
Adaptive Force (AF) reflects the capability of the neuromuscular system to adapt adequately to external forces with the intention of maintaining a position or motion. One specific approach to assessing AF is to measure force and limb position during a pneumatically applied increasing external force. Through this method, the highest (AF(max)), the maximal isometric (AFiso(max)) and the maximal eccentric Adaptive Force (AFecc(max)) can be determined. The main question of the study was whether the AFiso(max) is a specific and independent parameter of muscle function compared to other maximal forces. In 13 healthy subjects (9 male and 4 female), the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (pre- and post-MVIC), the three AF parameters and the MVIC with a prior concentric contraction (MVICpri-con) of the elbow extensors were measured 4 times on two days. Arithmetic mean (M) and maximal (Max) torques of all force types were analyzed. Regarding the reliability of the AF parameters between days, the mean changes were 0.31-1.98 Nm (0.61%-5.47%, p = 0.175-0.552), the standard errors of measurements (SEM) were 1.29-5.68 Nm (2.53%-15.70%) and the ICCs(3,1) = 0.896-0.996. M and Max of AFiso(max), AF(max) and pre-MVIC correlated highly (r = 0.85-0.98). The M and Max of AFiso(max) were significantly lower (6.12-14.93 Nm; p <= 0.001-0.009) and more variable between trials (coefficient of variation (CVs) >= 21.95%) compared to those of pre-MVIC and AF(max) (CVs <= 5.4%). The results suggest the novel measuring procedure is suitable to reliably quantify the AF, whereby the presented measurement errors should be taken into consideration. The AFiso(max) seems to reflect its own strength capacity and should be detected separately. It is suggested its normalization to the MVIC or AF(max) could serve as an indicator of a neuromuscular function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据