4.6 Article

A Promising Approach: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) Diagnosis Using Cluster Analysis

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081445

关键词

SIBO; breath testing; cluster analysis; data driven; artificial intelligence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82000502, 81770584]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by excessive bacteria in the small intestine, with diagnosis dependent on breath testing. This study utilized artificial intelligence to analyze a large dataset, discussing the potential application in SIBO diagnosis.
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by abnormal and excessive amounts of bacteria in the small intestine. Since symptoms and lab tests are non-specific, the diagnosis of SIBO is highly dependent on breath testing. There is a lack of a universally accepted cut-off point for breath testing to diagnose SIBO, and the dilemma of defining SIBO patients has made it more difficult to explore the gold standard for SIBO diagnosis. How to validate the gold standard for breath testing without defining SIBO patients has become an imperious demand in clinic. Breath-testing datasets from 1071 patients were collected from Xiangya Hospital in the past 3 years and analyzed with an artificial intelligence method using cluster analysis. K-means and DBSCAN algorithms were applied to the dataset after the clustering tendency was confirmed with Hopkins Statistic. Satisfying the clustering effect was evaluated with a Silhouette score, and patterns of each group were described. Advantages of artificial intelligence application in adaptive breath-testing diagnosis criteria with SIBO were discussed from the aspects of high dimensional analysis, and data-driven and regional specific dietary influence. This research work implied a promising application of artificial intelligence for SIBO diagnosis, which would benefit clinical practice and scientific research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据