4.6 Article

Anion-Ordering Phase Transitions in Biferrocenium and Ferrocenium Salts with the Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide Anion

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 32, 页码 21139-21146

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03059

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI [20H02756]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H02756] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the phase transitions and crystal structures of four Tf2N salts, all of which exhibited phase transitions at low temperatures with anion ordering. X-ray crystallography revealed that one of the salts had a symmetrical cation structure in the room-temperature phase, but an unsymmetrical structure in the low-temperature phase.
The bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide anion (Tf2N), which is a common component of ionic liquids, often exhibits disorder in the solid state. In this study, the phase transitions and crystal structures of the Tf2N salts of 1,1'''-dineopentyl-1',1 ''-biferrocene (=npBifc), 1',1 ''-biferrocene (=Bifc), ferrocene, and cobaltocene (1-4, respectively) were compared. All the salts exhibited phase transitions at low temperatures, which are accompanied by anion ordering, though the ordering was not complete in 2 and 3. X-ray crystallographic investigation revealed that the cations and anions in 1 and 2 adopted alternating arrangements and segregated columnar arrangements, respectively. The cation in 1 exhibited a symmetrical, average-valence structure in the room-temperature phase owing to rapid valence tautomerization, whereas the cation exhibited an unsymmetrical structure in the low-temperature phase. The cation in 2 exhibited an unsymmetrical, trapped-valence structure in both phases. The cation valence states in these salts were accounted for by the electrostatic interactions between the cations and anions. The crystal structures and phase behavior of the ferrocenium salt 3 were very different from those of 4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据