4.6 Article

Ferrate(VI) Oxidation Mechanism of Substituted Anilines: A Density Functional Theory Investigation

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 22, 页码 14317-14326

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01134

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1903901]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of the Educational Department of Liaoning Province [JYT2020043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the oxidation mechanism of SANs by Fe(VI) using DFT, revealing that the primary oxidations of SANs follow the HAT mechanism, with the hydroxyl oxygen being more reactive than the carbonyl oxygen. Formation of SAN radicals is crucial, and substituents have a greater influence on the reaction than the position.
Ferrate( VI) (Fe(VI)) is a promising oxidant coagulant and disinfectant for the degradation of organic micropollutants. However, it is hard to elucidate the detailed oxidation mechanism through the current experimental approaches. Substituted anilines (SANs) are important chemical compounds that are widely used in many industries. This paper presents the use of density functional theory (DFT) to understand the oxidation mechanism of SANs by Fe(VI) and the effect of substituents. The calculation results revealed that the primary oxidations of SANs follow the hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) mechanism. Interestingly, the hydroxyl oxygen of HFeO4- is more reactive than the carbonyl oxygen when reacting with SANs. The formation of the SAN radical is crucial, and all of the products are formed from it. Azobenzene is more favorable to generate the above products. In addition, the obtained results indicate that this kind of substituent has a much greater influence on the reaction rather than the position. Thus, the present study provides a valuable insight into the transformation pathways of SANs in the Fe(VI) oxidation process and the effects of the substituent on oxidation. These results will advance the understanding of Fe(VI) involved in wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据