4.7 Article

Yield, Fruit Quality, and Storability of 'Canino' Apricot in Response to Aminoethoxyvinylglycine, Salicylic Acid, and Chitosan

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10091838

关键词

ethylene inhibitors; aminoethoxyvinylglycine; salicylic acid; chitosan; malondialdehyde; PaACS1; quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that high concentrations of AVG and SA reduced preharvest fruit drop, increased yield and fruit firmness, and decreased weight loss and increased total acidity during cold storage. SA had the highest overall taste acceptability.
Ethylene plays a pivotal role in the climacteric fruit ripening and senescence process. The effect of three ethylene inhibitors on the yield, quality, and storability of 'Canino' apricot fruit was studied. Foliar sprays of distilled water (control), aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) (150 and 100 mg.L-1), salicylic acid (SA) (4 and 2 mM), and chitosan (2.5% and 1.5%) were applied 30 and 15 days before harvest. Results indicated that the high concentrations of AVG and SA recorded the lowest percentage of preharvest fruit drop and, hence, the highest yield. Trees receiving either concentration of AVG showed the highest fruit firmness. High concentrations of all three ethylene inhibitors reduced fruit weight loss, total carotenoids, and soluble solid content (SSC), but increased total acidity (TA) during cold storage (2 degrees C). A high score of overall taste acceptability was observed with a higher concentration of SA, which was also recorded the lowest fruit malondialdehyde content (MDA) at harvest and during storage. The highest concentrations of SA and chitosan recorded no decay for 28 days of storage. Gene expression analysis reflected higher expression of PaACS1 gene with the highest concentrations of ethylene inhibitors, suggesting that SA (4 mM) is recommended for optimal yield, quality, and storability of 'Canino' apricot fruit grown under Egyptian conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据