4.7 Article

Salicylic and Methyl Salicylic Acid Affect Quality and Phenolic Profile of Apple Fruits Three Weeks before the Harvest

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10091807

关键词

phenolics; bioactive compounds; phenylalanine ammonium lyase; chalcone synthase; chalcone isomerase; flavanone-3 beta-hydroxylase

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) (Horticulture Program) [P4-0013-0481]
  2. Austrian Science Foundation FWF [P25399-B16]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25399] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spraying apple trees with methyl salicylic acid (MeSA) and salicylic acid (SA) during fruit maturation affects the quality and phenolic composition of the fruit. While these treatments improve levels of certain beneficial polyphenols, they also have negative effects on the external quality characteristics of the fruit.
Effects of spraying over apple trees (Malus domestica; 'Topaz') with methyl salicylic acid (MeSA) and SA during fruit maturation were investigated for quality parameters (weight, firmness, hue angle, red blush, yield) and phenolic profile of the peel and pulp (HPLC-mass spectrometry). These treatment effects were also investigated for activities of the phenylpropanoid pathway enzymes phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, chalcone synthase and isomerase (combined), and flavanone-3 beta-hydroxylase. The MeSA and SA treatments resulted in poor fruit peel coloration, with higher hue angles and 20% and 10% lower red blush, respectively. Anthocyanin levels were also significantly lower (56%) for MeSA treatment. MeSA stimulated activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and chalcone synthase/isomerase, which resulted in higher levels of flavanols (to 34%), flavonols (to 33%), and hydroxycinnamic acids (to 29%), versus control. Therefore, while these salicylate treatments improve levels of some beneficial polyphenols, they also have negative effects on the external quality characteristics of the fruit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据