4.7 Article

Waste-Derived NPK Nanofertilizer Enhances Growth and Productivity of Capsicum annuum L.

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10061144

关键词

Capsicum annum L.; nanofertilizer; waste recycling; chitosan; foliar fertilizers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waste generation is a global issue requiring effective management for human, animal, and environmental health. Recycling is a key method to reduce waste. This study showed that eco-friendly preparation of waste NPK composites at low concentrations can enhance the growth and productivity of Capsicum plants.
Waste generation is a global issue that necessitates effective management for both human and animal health as well as environment. There are several ways to reduce waste, but recycling appears to be the best choice. By recycling, not only will the problem of pollution be resolved, but valuable compounds could be generated to be used as nutrients for plants. In this study, eco-friendly methods were established to produce alpha- and beta-chitosan (CS) (as a source of nitrogen) with different degrees of deacetylation from shrimp shells and squid pin waste, phosphorous through degreasing and calcination of bovine bone and potassium from evaporation of banana peels Kolakhar. The waste bulk products were physically characterized and dry-milled into nano-powders. Different concentrations of the produced nano-NPK fertilizer (10%, 25%, 50% and 100%) were foliar-applied to Capsicum annum L. cv. Cordoba plants and compared to commercial chemical fertilizer and untreated control plants. The obtained results revealed that the nano-composite NPK with 25% concentration significantly promoted growth, yield and harvest of C. annuum as compared with the control and chemical fertilizer-treated plants. This study demonstrated that the use of an eco-friendly preparation of waste NPK composites, with a low concentration, could be applied as foliar fertilizer over chemical fertilizer to enhance the growth and productivity of Capsicum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据