4.7 Article

Reintroducing Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) to the Mediterranean Basin: The Importance of Nitrogen Fertilization

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10091758

关键词

Accumulated growing-degree days (AGDDs); flax; nitrogen fertilization; nitrogen indices; Mediterranean basin; climate change

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reintroduction of flax in the Mediterranean region has attracted increasing interest. This study evaluated the effects of nitrogen fertilization on the performance of flax cv. Everest in Western Greece. Results showed that while the highest fertilization rate increased yield, it also prolonged the crop cycle and may lead to significant yield losses, indicating that lower fertilization rates were more efficient in terms of yield and crop cycle duration.
An increasing interest has been reported regarding the reintroduction of flax in the Mediterranean region. The aim of this present study was to evaluate the effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the performance of flax cv. Everest, under Mediterranean climate conditions. A two-year study was carried out in 2018-2019, in Western Greece. The experiment was set-up in a randomized complete block design with four replications and six treatments of different N fertilization rates (0, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 kg N ha(-1)). Measurements included plant biomass, the leaf area index (LAI), the yield, and the Growth Degree Days (GDDs) required for full seed maturity. The N uptake of flax was also evaluated utilizing the Nitrogen Harvesting (NHI) and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency (NUtE) indices. Although the highest fertilization rate (60N) increased the yield by 35.4% (2018) and 23.1% (2019), a GDDs and N indices assessment revealed that it noted the lowest efficiency and may lead to significant yield losses, as it significantly prolonged the crop cycle. On the contrary, even though fertilization rates of 20 and 30 kg N ha(-1) increased the yield only by 7% and 15% (on average), they were more efficient, and prolonged the crop cycle less (compared to 60N).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据