4.5 Review

The Neuropsychology of Emotion and Emotion Regulation: The Role of Laterality and Hierarchy

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11081075

关键词

emotion; emotion regulation; process model of emotion regulation; reappraisal; suppression; laterality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the development and controversies in affective neuroscience, emphasizing the need to consider a hierarchical dimension to understand the neural basis of emotion and lateralization. It highlights the importance of exploring the interaction between emotional components and suggests the lateralization of cognitive tools, rather than the entire emotional process, in managing feelings.
Over the last few decades, work in affective neuroscience has increasingly investigated the neural basis of emotion. A central debate in the field, when studying individuals with brain damage, has been whether emotional processes are lateralized or not. This review aims to expand this debate, by considering the need to include a hierarchical dimension to the problem. The historical journey of the diverse literature is presented, particularly focusing on the need to develop a research program that explores the neural basis of a wide range of emotional processes (perception, expression, experience, regulation, decision making, etc.), and also its relation to lateralized cortical and deep-subcortical brain structures. Of especial interest is the study of the interaction between emotional components; for example, between emotion generation and emotion regulation. Finally, emerging evidence from lesion studies is presented regarding the neural basis of emotion-regulation strategies, for which the issue of laterality seems most relevant. It is proposed that, because emotion-regulation strategies are complex higher-order cognitive processes, the question appears to be not the lateralization of the entire emotional process, but the lateralization of the specific cognitive tools we use to manage our feelings, in a range of different ways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据