4.5 Review

The Difficult Integration between Human and Animal Studies on Emotional Lateralization: A Perspective Article

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11080975

关键词

laterality of emotions in animals; models of emotional lateralization; right lateralization of sympathetic components of emotions; asymmetries in experience and expression of emotions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have shown that hemispheric asymmetries exist in various nonhuman species, particularly in emotional functions. While research on emotional lateralization in humans and animals has developed independently, there are similarities, such as the right lateralization of sympathetic functions in emergency situations.
Even if for many years hemispheric asymmetries have been considered as a uniquely human feature, an increasing number of studies have described hemispheric asymmetries for various behavioral functions in several nonhuman species. An aspect of animal lateralization that has attracted particular attention has concerned the hemispheric asymmetries for emotions, but human and animal studies on this subject have been developed as independent lines of investigation, without attempts for their integration. In this perspective article, after an illustration of factors that have hampered the integration between human and animal studies on emotional lateralization, I will pass to analyze components and stages of the processing of emotions to distinguish those which point to a continuum between humans and many animal species, from those which suggest a similarity only between humans and great apes. The right lateralization of sympathetic functions (involved in brain and bodily activities necessary in emergency situations) seems consistent across many animal species, whereas asymmetries in emotional communication and in structures involved in emotional experience, similar to those observed in humans, have been documented only in primates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据