4.5 Article

Differential NPY-Y1 Receptor Density in the Motor Cortex of ALS Patients and Familial Model of ALS

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11080969

关键词

motor cortex; upper motor neurons; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; neuropeptide Y

资金

  1. Fight MND Translational Research Grant [D0024892]
  2. Motor Neuron Disease Australia [C0027649]
  3. Tasmanian Masonic Medical Research Foundation [D0019780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the density of NPY-Y1 receptors on upper motor neurons in ALS, revealing a potential novel pathway for modulating upper motor neuron activity.
Destabilization of faciliatory and inhibitory circuits is an important feature of corticomotor pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). While GABAergic inputs to upper motor neurons are reduced in models of the disease, less understood is the involvement of peptidergic inputs to upper motor neurons in ALS. The neuropeptide Y (NPY) system has been shown to confer neuroprotection against numerous pathogenic mechanisms implicated in ALS. However, little is known about how the NPY system functions in the motor system. Herein, we investigate post-synaptic NPY signaling on upper motor neurons in the rodent and human motor cortex, and on cortical neuron populations in vitro. Using immunohistochemistry, we show the increased density of NPY-Y1 receptors on the soma of SMI32-positive upper motor neurons in post-mortem ALS cases and SOD1(G93A) excitatory cortical neurons in vitro. Analysis of receptor density on Thy1-YFP-H-positive upper motor neurons in wild-type and SOD1(G)(93)(A) mouse tissue revealed that the distribution of NPY-Y1 receptors was changed on the apical processes at early-symptomatic and late-symptomatic disease stages. Together, our data demonstrate the differential density of NPY-Y1 receptors on upper motor neurons in a familial model of ALS and in ALS cases, indicating a novel pathway that may be targeted to modulate upper motor neuron activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据