4.7 Article

Bioavailability of phosphorus in granulated and pyrolyzed broiler manure

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101584

关键词

Poultry litter; Biochar; Slow pyrolysis; Granulation; Organic fertilizer; Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

资金

  1. Nutrient Recycling Pilot Programme
  2. Maa-ja vesitekniikan tuki ry, Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Granulated poultry manure can be used as a phosphorus fertilizer for annual crops with similar bioavailability to mineral fertilizer phosphorus, while pyrolyzed poultry manure is suitable as a slow-release or storage phosphorus fertilizer.
Production of organic fertilizers from poultry manure may compromise availability of phosphorus (P) to plants. This study examined the effects of granulation, feather meal addition, and pyrolysis on bioavailability of P in broiler manure in a pot experiment with ryegrass and assessed whether P availability is enhanced by inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) into soil. Granulated broiler manure gave similar plant yield and P uptake to superphosphate. Feather meal addition had a minor negative effect on P availability, whereas pyrolysis lowered the fertilization effect of broiler manure. The yield-based mineral-P equivalences were 120%, 85% and 75% during the first harvest, and 100%, 75% and 45% during one growing season for granulated unamended, granulated amended with feather meal and pyrolyzed broiler manure. Soil inoculation with AMF did not enhance P availability. Granulated poultry manure is suitable as a P fertilizer for annual crops with comparable bioavailability to mineral fertilizer P, whereas pyrolyzed poultry manure is suitable as a slow-release or storage P fertilizer in slightly acidic soils. Knowledge on P bioavailability in organic fertilizers produced with different technologies can be used for optimizing fertilization, minimizing build-up of soil P and its adverse environmental effects. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据