4.6 Article

PhytoAFP: In Silico Approaches for Designing Plant-Derived Antifungal Peptides

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10070815

关键词

plant defensins; innate immunity; host defense peptides; antimicrobial peptides

资金

  1. International Mobility of Researchers of Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic [CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/16_027/0008371]
  2. CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (CIMAP), Lucknow, India
  3. Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU)-India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study team developed an SVM-based model for designing and predicting plant-derived antifungal peptides. The analysis showed preferences for C, G, K, R, S in amino acid sequences, with G, K, R, A dominating the N-terminal and N, S, C, G preferring the C-terminal. Motif analysis revealed the presence of motifs like NYVF, NYVFP, YVFP, NYVFPA, VFPA.
Emerging infectious diseases (EID) are serious problems caused by fungi in humans and plant species. They are a severe threat to food security worldwide. In our current work, we have developed a support vector machine (SVM)-based model that attempts to design and predict therapeutic plant-derived antifungal peptides (PhytoAFP). The residue composition analysis shows the preference of C, G, K, R, and S amino acids. Position preference analysis shows that residues G, K, R, and A dominate the N-terminal. Similarly, residues N, S, C, and G prefer the C-terminal. Motif analysis reveals the presence of motifs like NYVF, NYVFP, YVFP, NYVFPA, and VFPA. We have developed two models using various input functions such as mono-, di-, and tripeptide composition, as well as binary, hybrid, and physiochemical properties, based on methods that are applied to the main data set. The TPC-based monopeptide composition model achieved more accuracy, 94.4%, with a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.89. Correspondingly, the second-best model based on dipeptides achieved an accuracy of 94.28% under the MCC 0.89 of the training dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据