4.7 Article

Species co-occurrence and phylogenetic structure of terrestrial vertebrates at regional scales

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 455-463

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12428

关键词

Competitive exclusion; environmental filtering; neutral process; phylogenetic structure; spatial scale; species assemblage; taxonomic level; vertebrates

资金

  1. key project of science-technology basic condition platform from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2005DKA21402]
  2. Key Grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China [31330013]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists [2013T1S0018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo determine how taxonomic level and spatial scale affect the phylogenetic structure of species assemblages across four classes of terrestrial vertebrates. LocationMainland China. MethodsUsing species distribution data from Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia and Amphibia, including 2153 species from 2105 counties and 1632 species from 295 nature reserves across mainland China, we analysed the phylogenetic structure of co-occurring species at multiple taxonomic levels (class, order, family and genus) and spatial scales. ResultsWe found that phylogenetic clustering and unstructured patterns were more frequent than phylogenetic overdispersion in all groups. There was a higher frequency of phylogenetic clustering within classes and orders than within families and genera, while spatial scale had little effect on the frequency of phylogenetic clustering. Birds and mammals showed less frequent clustering patterns than amphibians and reptiles. Main conclusionsPhylogenetic clustering in terrestrial vertebrates was predominant over overdispersion at regional scales and higher taxonomic levels. Our results suggest that regional ecological and evolutionary factors, such as environmental filtering and speciation relative to extinction or colonization rates, are important in determining species assemblages of animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据