4.6 Review

Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Agriculture and Food Production Systems in Africa: A Systematic Review

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10080976

关键词

antimicrobial; use; resistance; agriculture; food production; Africa

资金

  1. Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a lack of information on antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in agriculture and food production systems in Africa, but data shows that cattle and poultry production are the largest consumers of antimicrobials in the region. Some countries have developed policies to address this issue, but face challenges in enforcement.
In Africa, there is dearth of information on antimicrobial use (AMU) in agriculture and food production systems and its consequential resistance in pathogens that affect animal, human and environmental health. Data published between 1980 and 2021 on the magnitude of AMU and AMR in agriculture and food productions systems in Africa were reviewed. Data from 13-27 countries in Africa indicate that 3558-4279 tonnes of antimicrobials were used in animals from 2015 to 2019. Tetracyclines and polypeptides contributed the largest proportion of antimicrobials used. Cattle and poultry production account for the largest consumption of antimicrobials in Africa. Although limited studies have reported AMR in crops, fish and beekeeping, AMR from a variety of farm animals has been substantially documented in Africa. Some countries in Africa have developed policies/plans to address AMU and AMR in agriculture and food production systems; however, their enforcement is challenged by weak regulations. In conclusion, although there is limited information on the quantities of antimicrobials used in agriculture and food production system, the levels of AMR are high. There is a need to strengthen regulatory authorities with a capacity to monitor AMU in agriculture and food production systems in Africa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据