4.7 Article

Offline Solid-Phase Extraction and Separation of Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons and Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Edible Oils, and Analysis via GC with a Flame Ionization Detector

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10092026

关键词

edible oils; gas chromatography-flame ionization detector; mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons; mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons; solid-phase extraction

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spain
  2. FEDER [RTC-2017-6170-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method has been developed for the determination of mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) and mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH) in edible oils, achieving similar quantification limits to online extraction methods. The method involves isolation of MOSH and MOAH in a silver nitrated silica gel stationary phase prior to analysis by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). The method was validated and applied to a total of 27 samples of different types of oil, detecting MOSH up to 79.2 mg/kg and MOAH up to 22.4 mg/kg.
A method was developed for the determination of mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) and mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH) in edible oils, achieving similar limits of quantification than those obtained by online extraction methodologies, i.e., 0.5 mg/kg. The isolation of MOSH and MOAH was performed in a silver nitrated silica gel stationary phase prior to their analysis by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). To improve the sensitivity, the simulated on-column injection method, using a suitable liner, was optimized. The method was validated at 0.5, 10.0 and 17.9 mg/kg, and recoveries ranged from 80 to 110%. Intra and inter-day precision were evaluated at the same levels, and relative standard deviation (RSD) was lower than 20%. The method was applied to a total of 27 samples of different types of oil previously analyzed in an accredited laboratory, detecting MOSH up to 79.2 mg/kg and MOAH up to 22.4 mg/kg.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据