4.7 Article

A Consumer Segmentation Study for Meat and Meat Alternatives in Switzerland

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10061273

关键词

meat consumption; meat alternatives; market segmentation; cluster analysis; Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified six distinct consumer groups related to meat and meat alternatives, covering all types of consumers, from uncompromising meat-eaters to health-conscious meat avoiders. The results showed that meat alternatives can be a complementary component in one's diet, not just a substitute for meat. The study provides useful information for the food industry in producing and marketing meat and meat alternatives to different target groups.
The aim of this study was to identify consumer groups regarding meat and meat alternatives, which are homogeneous in themselves but very different from one another. To date, the literature has analysed the attitudes towards, and the motives behind, the consumption of meat and meat alternatives. However, segmentation research portraying homogeneous consumer groups that are consuming or willing to consume meat alternatives is lacking. This study closes this research gap and, in doing so, also shows how meat consumption is related to the consumption of alternative products. A questionnaire was sent out to a random sample in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland, resulting in 561 responses. A hierarchical cluster analysis using seven scales revealed six distinct consumer groups, which covered all types of consumers, from the uncompromising meat-eater to the health-conscious meat avoider. The results show that meat alternatives are not always consumed as a substitute for meat but can also be a complementary component in one's diet. This study contributes to the scientific literature by providing useful information for the food industry involved in producing and marketing meat and meat alternatives to different target groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据