4.7 Article

Effect of Bran Pre-Treatment with Endoxylanase on the Characteristics of Intermediate Wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) Bread

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10071464

关键词

intermediate wheatgrass; arabinoxylans; TAXI; xylanase; bran treatment; bran-enriched bread; perennial grains

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xylanase pretreatment enhances bread properties when incorporating IWG bran, but may lead to structural collapse and uneven bread surfaces during baking. Addition of ascorbic acid can partially mitigate these effects, but further research is needed to improve bread appearance.
Previous work indicated that bran removal promotes network formation in breads prepared from intermediate wheatgrass (IWG) flour. However, refinement reduces yields as well as contents of nutritionally beneficial compounds such as fiber. This study evaluated xylanase pretreatment of IWG bran as a processing option to enhance the properties of bread made with half of the original bran content. Xylanase pretreatment did not affect stickiness but significantly reduced hardness and increased specific loaf volumes compared to negative (without xylanase) and positive controls (with xylanase but without pretreatment). However, the surface of breads with pretreated bran was uneven due to structural collapse during baking. Fewer but larger gas cells were present due to pretreatment. Addition of ascorbic acid modulated these effects, but did not prevent uneven surfaces. Accessible thiol concentrations were slightly but significantly increased by xylanase pretreatment, possibly due to a less compact crumb structure. Endogenous xylanases (apparent activity 0.46 and 5.81 XU/g in flour and bran, respectively) may have been activated during the pretreatment. Moreover, Triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor activity was also detected (193 and 410 InU/g in flour and bran). Overall, xylanase pretreatment facilitates incorporation of IWG bran into breads, but more research is needed to improve bread appearance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据