4.7 Article

Applications of Lactobacillus acidophilus-Fermented Mango Protected Clostridioides difficile Infection and Developed as an Innovative Probiotic Jam

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10071631

关键词

jam; Lactobacillus acidophilus; Clostridioides difficile; mango; Faecalibacterium prausnitzii

资金

  1. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan [110AS-14.1.1-ST-a3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactobacillus acidophilus-fermented mango products inhibit the growth of Clostridioides difficile, promote the growth of next-generation probiotic Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and protect gut barrier function, while also developing innovative products. High hydrostatic pressure-treated mango jam with L. acidophilus fermentation exhibits favorable texture characteristics and sensory quality.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a large intestine disease caused by toxins produced by the spore-forming bacterium C. difficile, which belongs to Gram-positive bacillus. Using antibiotics treatment disturbances in the gut microbiota and toxins produced by C. difficile disrupt the intestinal barrier. Some evidence indicates fecal microbiota transplantation and probiotics may decrease the risk of CDI recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fermented mango by using the lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus and develop innovative products in the form of fermented mango jam. L. acidophilus-fermented mango products inhibited the growth of C. difficile while promoting the growth of next-generation probiotic Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Both supernatant and precipitate of mango-fermented products prevented cell death in gut enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells against C. difficile infection. Mango-fermented products also protected gut barrier function by elevating the expression of tight junction proteins. Moreover, L. acidophilus-fermented mango jam with high hydrostatic pressure treatment had favorable textural characteristics and sensory quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据