4.7 Review

A Systematic Analysis of Research on Arcobacter: Public Health Implications from a Food-Environment Interphase Perspective

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10071673

关键词

Arcobacter; food safety; public health; environment; gastrointestinal disease; emerging pathogen; enteric bacteria

资金

  1. South African Medical Research Council
  2. USAID/DST (South Africa) Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global research landscape of the public health implications of Arcobacter from the food-environment interphase shows a significant growth in research, particularly in areas such as isolation and detection of the pathogen, pathogenesis, and genetic diversity. However, research themes in the prevalence and epidemiology seem to be underexplored in this field.
This review maps the global research landscape of the public health implications of Arcobacter from the food-environment interphase using content analytics and integrated science mapping. The search term Arcobacter was used to retrieve relevant articles published in Web of Science and Scopus between 1991 to 2019. The number of articles included in the review was 524, with 1304 authors, 172 journal sources, and a collaborative index of 2.55. The annual growth rate of the publications was 9.74%. The most contributing author in the field was Houf K., with 40 publications, 26 h-index, and 2020 total citations. The most productive country was the USA (13.33%). The majority of the articles were published in English (96%) and in the Journal of Food Protection (8.02%). The highest research outputs were in the field of Microbiology (264). The frequently occurred keywords were Arcobacter, poultry, shellfish, cattle, and chicken. This study revealed a fair increase in the growth rate of Arcobacter-related research-especially in the area of isolation and detection of the pathogen in foods and food environments, as well as the pathogenesis and genetic diversity of the pathogen. Research themes in the area of prevalence and epidemiology seem to be underexplored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据