4.7 Article

Effect of Various Types of Sugar Binder on the Physical Properties of Gum Powders Prepared via Fluidized-Bed Agglomeration

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10061387

关键词

physical property; gum powder; sugar binder; particle agglomeration

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [NRF-2019R1A2C1085195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agglomeration of fine gum powders using sugar binders can enhance their physical properties, resulting in larger particles and higher porosity. The combination of different gums and sugar solutions during agglomeration affects the flowability and structural properties of the powders.
Particle agglomeration of fine gum powders to improve their physical and morphological characteristics is of crucial importance. Changes in the physical properties of guar gum, locust bean gum, and carboxymethyl cellulose powders subjected to fluidized-bed agglomeration with various sugar types as the binder were examined. The agglomerates with sugar binders had much larger particles (D-50) and higher porosity (epsilon) than the corresponding fine gum powders, as confirmed by particle-size-distribution analysis and scanning electron microscopy. In particular, the carboxymethyl cellulose agglomerate exhibited much higher D-50 and epsilon values than the original fine gum powder, with sorbitol as the binder resulting in the highest D-50 and epsilon values. Except for guar gum with sorbitol as the binder, the guar gum and locust bean gum agglomerates with the other sugar binders showed lower Carr index and Hausner ratio values (thus exhibiting better flowability and lower cohesiveness) than the original powders, whereas those of the carboxymethyl cellulose agglomerates were higher. These findings indicate that the physical and structural properties of gum powders can be greatly improved according to the type of gum and sugar solution used in the agglomeration process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据