4.7 Article

In-House Validation of an SPE-GC-FID Method for the Detection of Free and Esterified Hydroxylated Minor Compounds in Virgin Olive Oils

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10061260

关键词

olive oil; authenticity; sterols; hydroxylated minor compounds; purity; quality; fraud; esterified compounds; in-house validation

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 European Research OLEUM project Advanced solutions for assuring the authenticity and quality of olive oil at a global scale [635690]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [635690] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple method for analyzing minor compounds in olive and sunflower oils has been developed, allowing for reliable quantification and assessment of oil authenticity. The method is straightforward, with the ability to analyze various oil samples effectively.
Minor compounds in vegetable oils are distributed between free and esterified forms, and the ratio of these two fractions could represent an important parameter for assessment of oil authenticity. A simple method based on offline SPE-GC-FID for the analysis of free and esterified hydroxylated minor compounds in olive and sunflower oils has been developed and in-house validated. A satisfactory repeatability relative standard deviation (<7.5%) was obtained in all cases. The method, which requires simple instrumentation, allows for reliable quantification in a single chromatographic run with the advantages of minimizing sample manipulation, use of toxic solvents and reagents, and time consumption. The analytical procedure was applied to pure oil samples, including 15 authentic extra virgin olive oils collected from different European countries (Spain, Italy, Greece, and Portugal). Finally, the proposed SPE-GC-FID methodology could detect changes in the ratio between the free and esterified forms in pure extra virgin olive oil when mixed with refined sunflower oil at different percentages of 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20% (w/w) to simulate adulteration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据