4.7 Article

Elucidation of Volatiles, Anthocyanins, Antioxidant and Sensory Properties of cv. Caner Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Juices Produced from Three Juice Extraction Methods

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10071497

关键词

pomegranate; cv; Caner; juice extraction methods; aroma compounds; anthocyanins; antioxidants

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [TUBITAK-2216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlighted the impact of different juice extraction methods on the phytochemical profiles, volatile compounds, and antioxidant activities of pomegranate juices. Macerated arils extraction method showed highest number of volatile compounds while halved pomegranate extraction method was preferred in terms of sensory quality.
This study deals with the characterization of the phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities of cv. Caner pomegranate (Punica granatum) juices obtained from three different juice extraction methods including halved pomegranate (HPJ), arils (AJ), and macerated arils (MAJ) extraction for the first time. It was found that the type of the juice extraction process had substantial effects on the volatiles, anthocyanin compositions, and antioxidant activities of the samples. Results showed that the AJ sample (593 mg L-1) had more anthocyanin compounds followed by HPJ (555 mg L-1) and MAJ (408 mg L-1) samples. GC-MS analysis revealed a total of 34 volatile compounds. The highest number of volatiles was found in the MAJ sample (1872 mu g L-1); thus, the aril maceration process played an important role in increasing the volatiles as compared to the HPJ (751.8 mu g L-1) and AJ (710.7 mu g L-1) samples. Sensory analysis showed that the HPJ sample was the most preferred and its general impression was higher as compared to the AJ and MAJ samples. The findings of this study elucidated that the juice extraction technique had a significant influence on the phytochemical profiles, sensory quality, and antioxidant activity of pomegranate juices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据