4.6 Article

General quantum Bernoulli factory: framework analysis and experiments

期刊

QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/ac2061

关键词

quantum Bernoulli factory; quantum randomness processing; photonic logic

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62061136011, 61632021, 61832003, 61801459, 61872334]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB28000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of quantum-enhanced randomness processing, known as the quantum Bernoulli factory (QBF), accelerates the applications of classical Bernoulli factories and demonstrates its advantages. Through framework analysis and experimental demonstration, the superiority and potential applications of QBF over the classical model are proven.
The unremitting pursuit for quantum advantages gives rise to the discovery of a quantum-enhanced randomness processing named quantum Bernoulli factory (QBF). This quantum enhanced process can show its priority over the corresponding classical process through readily available experimental resources, thus in the near term it may be capable of accelerating the applications of classical Bernoulli factories, such as the widely used sampling algorithms. In this work, we provide the framework analysis of the QBF. We thoroughly analyze the quantum state evolution in this process, discovering the field structure of the constructible quantum states. Our framework analysis shows that naturally, the previous works can be described as specific instances of this framework. Then, as a proof of principle, we experimentally demonstrate this framework via an entangled two-photon source along with a reconfigurable photonic logic, and show the advantages of the QBF over the classical model through a classically infeasible instance. These results may stimulate the discovery of advantages of the quantum randomness processing in a wider range of tasks, as well as its potential applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据