4.6 Article

Simulating quench dynamics on a digital quantum computer with data-driven error mitigation

期刊

QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/ac0e7a

关键词

quantum error mitigation; dynamical quantum simulation; data driven error mitigation

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SEV-2016-0597-19-4]
  2. 'la Caixa' Foundation [100010434, LCF/BQ/DI19/11730056]
  3. 'Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa' Programme [PGC2018-095862-B-C21, QUITEMAD + S2013/ICE-2801, SEV-2016-0597]
  4. CSIC Research Platform on Quantum Technologies [PTI-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Error mitigation through Clifford data regression (CDR) methods is crucial for achieving quantum advantage in the near term. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of CDR techniques in mitigating noise in quantum data, outperforming traditional zero-noise extrapolation methods. The research also shows that CDR-based approaches can accurately model complex observables like two-point correlation functions in large quantum systems.
Error mitigation is likely to be key in obtaining near term quantum advantage. In this work we present one of the first implementations of several Clifford data regression (CDR) based methods which are used to mitigate the effect of noise in real quantum data. We explore the dynamics of the 1D Ising model with transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields, highlighting signatures of confinement. We find in general CDR based techniques are advantageous in comparison with zero-noise extrapolation and obtain quantitative agreement with exact results for systems of nine qubits with circuit depths of up to 176, involving hundreds of CNOT gates. This is the largest systems investigated so far in a study of this type. We also investigate the two-point correlation function and find the effect of noise on this more complicated observable can be mitigated using Clifford quantum circuit data highlighting the utility of these methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据