4.6 Article

Unsupervised Phonocardiogram Analysis With Distribution Density Based Variational Auto-Encoders

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655084

关键词

phonocardiogram analysis; auto-encoder; data density; unsupervised learning; abnormality detection

资金

  1. National Neural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [62001038]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019XD-A05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes two methods based on estimating the density of vectors in the latent space to improve the performance of PCG analysis systems, showing that these methods outperform VAE-based methods; in addition, the representation of normal PCG signals in the latent space is investigated, with DBAE introducing Gaussian-like models for normal PCG representation.
This paper proposes an unsupervised way for Phonocardiogram (PCG) analysis, which uses a revised auto encoder based on distribution density estimation in the latent space. Auto encoders especially Variational Auto-Encoders (VAEs) and its variant beta-VAE are considered as one of the state-of-the-art methodologies for PCG analysis. VAE based models for PCG analysis assume that normal PCG signals can be represented by latent vectors that obey a normal Gaussian Model, which may not be necessary true in PCG analysis. This paper proposes two methods DBVAE and DBAE that are based on estimating the density of latent vectors in latent space to improve the performance of VAE based PCG analysis systems. Examining the system performance with PCG data from the a single domain and multiple domains, the proposed systems outperform the VAE based methods. The representation of normal PCG signals in the latent space is also investigated by calculating the kurtosis and skewness where DBAE introduces normal PCG representation following Gaussian-like models but DBVAE does not introduce normal PCG representation following Gaussian-like models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据