4.6 Article

Impact of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells on Gentamicin-Induced Renal Injury and Genotoxicity in Rats

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.689691

关键词

Gentamicin; nephrotoxicity; genotoxicity; cord blood; stem cell; KIM-1; NGAL; SRY

资金

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP -2020/222]
  2. DSR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that HUCB MNCs have a therapeutic effect against AKI and gentamicin-induced genotoxicity due to their regenerative property, significantly reducing renal damage and chromosomal aberrations.
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI), also known as acute renal failure (ARF), has received considerable critical attention in recent years. Gentamicin (GM) is an antibiotic whose prolonged use results in AKI with a high mortality rate. Methods: Fifty adult female albino rats weighing 150-200 g were used. The animals were divided into five groups: the first group was the normal healthy control one, the second group received only 1 x 10(6) HUCB mononuclear cells (MNCs)/rat by intravenous (iv) injection, the third diseased group was given GM 100 mg/kg for 10 consecutive days by intraperitoneal injections, the fourth preventive group received 1 x 10(6) HUCB MNCs/rat by iv injection 24 h before gentamicin treatment, and the fifth treated group received 1 x 10(6) HUCB MNCs/rat by iv injection 24 h after gentamicin treatment. After 1 week of treatment, blood samples were collected, and kidneys were removed for histopathological examination. Results: Rats treated with HUCB MNCs in the treated group had a significant decrease in renal damage, low levels of biomarkers for nephrotoxicities such as serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and low chromosomal aberrations compared to the diseased third group. The gene expression of KIM-1 and NGAL was decreased in response to HUCB treatment. Conclusions: HUCB MNCs have a curative effect against AKI and gentamicin-induced genotoxicity owing to their regenerative property.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据