4.6 Article

Investigation of Coagulation Biomarkers to Assess Clinical Deterioration in SARS-CoV-2 Infection

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.670694

关键词

COVID-19; intensive care; hypercoagulability; fibrinogen; thrombin generation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified fibrinogen and thrombin peak levels at admission as coagulation biomarkers associated with an increased risk of ICU admission or death in COVID-19 patients. These markers could aid in initiating appropriate treatments and triage for worsening patients, although further confirmation is warranted.
Since December 2019, a pandemic caused by a new coronavirus has spread to more than 170 countries around the world. Worsening infected patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission associated with 30% of mortality. A part of worsening is induced by hemostasis deregulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of coagulation activation in COVID-19 progression. Thirty-five of the 99 patients got clinically worse. The final model of the logistic regression analysis revealed that O-2 requirement (RR = 7.27 [1.50-19.31]), monocytes below 0.2G/L (RR = 2.88 [1.67-3.19]), fibrinogen levels (RR = 1.45 [1.17-1.82] per g/L increase), prothrombin fragments 1+2 higher than 290 pM (RR = 2.39 [1.20-3.30]), and thrombin peak (RR = 1.28 [1.03-1.59] per 50 nM increase) were associated with an increased risk of clinical worsening. A fibrinogen level threshold of 5.5 g/L, a thrombin peak measurement threshold of 99 pM, and O-2 requirement associated with clinical outcome in more than 80% of our cohort. In conclusion, we identified fibrinogen and thrombin peak at admission as coagulation biomarkers associated with an increased risk of ICU admission or death. This finding allows initiating steroids and triage for worsening patients. Our results should therefore be considered as exploratory and deserve confirmation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据