4.6 Article

Elevations in Liver Transaminases in COVID-19: (How) Are They Related?

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.705247

关键词

inflammation; interleukin-2; interleukin-10; lymphocytes; SARS-CoV-2; hepatitis; transaminases

资金

  1. FAPESP - Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2014/50867-3]
  2. CAPES - Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver transaminase abnormalities in COVID-19 patients are directly related to disease severity and inflammatory parameters. The study suggests that liver transaminases can serve as a complementary marker for disease severity in COVID-19 patients.
Liver involvement in COVID-19 is not yet well-understood, but elevations in liver transaminases have been described to occur in 14-53% of the cases and are more frequently seen in severe disease. This cross-sectional study explored the relationship between the elevations in liver transaminases and inflammatory parameters in 209 adults with COVID-19. Demographic and clinical data, serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and liver aminotransferases were analyzed. Three groups were formed according to the liver transaminase abnormalities: (I) Normal transaminases, (II) Borderline transaminases elevation, and (III) Mild to severe transaminases elevation. Altered liver transaminases were directly related to disease severity, showing association with the NEWS2 score at admission and greater need for ICU or death. Moreover, higher levels of IL-2 and CRP were associated with borderline transaminases elevations, whereas higher levels of IL-10 and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio were associated with mild to severe transaminases elevation. These results reinforce the importance of liver transaminases in patients with COVID-19 as a complementary marker for disease severity and also point to them as a parameter reflecting the continuous dynamics between viral infection and the immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据