4.7 Article

Effect of operating conditions on the performance of multichannel ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for cattle wastewater treatment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102102

关键词

Ultrafiltration; Ceramic membrane; Cattle wastewater; Treatment

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1901000]
  2. Fujian Province [2019T3027]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences STS Project [2019T3027]
  4. Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China [X20190302]
  5. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Biotransformation of Organic Solid Waste Program [SERC2020C02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that ceramic membranes performed well in treating cattle wastewater under specific operating conditions, achieving a concentration factor of five and maintaining stable performance through five independent cycles. This suggests that ceramic membranes could be an efficient treatment option for livestock and poultry breeding wastewater.
Ceramic membrane has been widely used in treatment of wastewater. In this study the performance of multichannel ceramic membranes in cattle wastewater treatment was studied under different operating conditions, including varied membrane pore size, transmembrane pressure (TMP), cross-flow velocity (CFV), operating temperature, and feed pH. According to the results, the optimal operating conditions were: membrane pore size - 50 nm, TMP - 0.2 MPa, CFV - 4 m/s, operating temperature - 40 degrees C, and original pH. Applying these conditions, cattle wastewater treatment concentration experiments were conducted, and the results showed that the membrane could operate up to a concentration factor of five, exhibiting suspended solid, turbidity, and total phosphorus removal rates of 100 %, 99.20 %, and 80.21 %, respectively. In addition, the membrane maintained stable performance through five independent cycles. These findings are expected to help facilitate an efficient ceramic membrane treatment for livestock and poultry breeding wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据