4.5 Review

Regulation of Antigenic Variation by Trypanosoma brucei Telomere Proteins Depends on Their Unique DNA Binding Activities

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10080967

关键词

antigenic variation; Trypanosoma brucei; VSG; telomere; TRF; RAP1; Myb domain; DNA binding activity

资金

  1. NIH [AI066095]
  2. Research Grants Council Hong Kong, PolyU [151062/18M]
  3. Shenzhen Basic Research Program [JCYJ20170818104619974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trypanosoma brucei regularly switches its major surface antigen to evade host immune response, with telomere and subtelomere structure integrity being crucial for its survival and pathogenesis. Telomere proteins TRF and RAP1, with unique nucleic acid binding activities, play key roles in VSG expression and switching. Targeting TbTRF and TbRAP1's nucleic acid binding activities may serve as a potential therapeutic strategy against T. brucei.
Trypanosoma brucei causes human African trypanosomiasis and regularly switches its major surface antigen, Variant Surface Glycoprotein (VSG), to evade the host immune response. Such antigenic variation is a key pathogenesis mechanism that enables T. brucei to establish long-term infections. VSG is expressed exclusively from subtelomere loci in a strictly monoallelic manner, and DNA recombination is an important VSG switching pathway. The integrity of telomere and subtelomere structure, maintained by multiple telomere proteins, is essential for T. brucei viability and for regulating the monoallelic VSG expression and VSG switching. Here we will focus on T. brucei TRF and RAP1, two telomere proteins with unique nucleic acid binding activities, and summarize their functions in telomere integrity and stability, VSG switching, and monoallelic VSG expression. Targeting the unique features of TbTRF and TbRAP10 s nucleic acid binding activities to perturb the integrity of telomere structure and disrupt VSG monoallelic expression may serve as potential therapeutic strategy against T. brucei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据