4.5 Article

Chicken Heat Shock Protein 70 Is an Essential Host Protein for Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Infection In Vitro

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10060664

关键词

IBDV; Hsp70; dsRNA; replication; host-virus interaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31702223]
  2. Project of Tianjin 131 Innovative Talent Team [20180318]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that chicken heat shock protein 70 (cHsp70) plays an important role in infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infection, potentially participating in the formation of the viral replication and transcription complex. Overexpression of cHsp70 promoted IBDV production, while knockdown of cHsp70 reduced viral production.
Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infection causes pathogenicity and mortality in chickens, leading to huge economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide. Studies of host-virus interaction can help us to better understand the viral pathogenicity. As a highly conservative host factor, heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) is observed to be involved in numerous viral infections. However, there is little information about the role of chicken Hsp70 (cHsp70) in IBDV infection. In the present study, the increased expression of cHsp70 was observed during IBDV-infected DF-1 cells. Further studies revealed that Hsp70 had similar locations with the viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), and the result of pull-down assay showed the direct interaction between cHsp70 with dsRNA, viral proteins (vp)2 and 3, indicating that maybe cHsp70 participates in the formation of the replication and transcription complex. Furthermore, overexpression of cHsp70 promoted IBDV production and knockdown of cHsp70 using small interfering RNAs (siRNA) and reducedviral production, implying the necessity of cHsp70 in IBDV infection. These results reveal that cHsp70 is essential for IBDV infection in DF-1 cells, suggesting that targeting cHsp70 may be applied as an antiviral strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据