4.7 Article

A new integrated system with thermal energy storage for five useful outputs: A case study

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101116

关键词

Energy; Energy storage; Renewables; Building; Multigeneration; Efficiency

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel renewable energy based integrated system design capable of producing multiple useful outputs and moderate thermal energy storage options. Through an energetic and exergetic thermodynamic analysis, the effectiveness of the system under varying conditions is studied, with a focus on its application in a high school in Calgary, Canada.
This paper proposes the design of a novel renewable energy based integrated system with thermal energy storage options which is capable of producing up to five useful outputs consisting of electricity, heating, cooling, freshwater, and hot water. The system is also capable of moderate thermal energy storage through the use of molten salts, NaNO3 and KNO3. Following the design of this integrated multigenerational system, an extensive energetic and exergetic thermodynamic analysis is conducted by studying heating and cooling, power outputs, storage capacities, and exergy destruction rates. The various parametric studies performed will help determine how effective the present system is able to operate under varying conditions such as changes in ambient temperature, and critical system state point values such as different temperatures, pressures, mass flow rates, etc. The proposed system is intended for a high school located within Calgary Alberta, Canada and applied as a case study. The specified system has overall energetic and exergetic efficiencies of 54.42% and 30.24%, respectively. The energetic coefficients of performance during heating and cooling are 0.8169 and 2.265, respectively while the exergetic coefficients of performance during heating and cooling are found 0.2683 and 0.3864, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据