4.7 Article

Optimal sizing of Solar Home Systems: Charge controller technology and its influence on system design

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101198

关键词

Solar Home Systems; System sizing; Multi-objective optimization; Charge controller technology; Open-source simulation tool

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of MPPT and PWM charge controller technologies on Solar Home Systems, revealing that MPPT controllers offer greater cost savings compared to PWM controllers by reducing installed photovoltaic peak power and battery capacity. A multi-objective optimization for different system sizes and locations demonstrates the effectiveness of MPPT controllers in reducing system costs, even for the smallest systems.
Solar Home Systems are a promising solution to enable access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for non-electrified areas, especially in the Global South. In this study, the influence of the charge controller technologies Maximum Point Tracker (MPPT) and Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) on the optimal system design and system performance is analyzed. Therefore, a multi-objective optimization that minimizes the number of days with Power-Cut-Offs and the Levelized Cost of Electricity for three Solar Home System sizes and three sub-saharan locations is conducted. Cost savings of the MPPT controller are in the range of 4.0% to 8.6% compared to the PWM controller. This is achieved by a reduction of the optimal installed photovoltaic peak power by 31.2% to 38.6% and the battery capacity by 2.8% to 8.8%. A sensitivity analysis shows the high robustness of cost savings regarding a variation in solar irradiance, load profile, and charge controller investment costs. Therefore, MPPT charge controllers are a promising solution even for the smallest Solar Home System sizes to reduce system costs compared to PWM controllers. The applied numerical simulation tool is open-source to enhance openness and transparency in modeling studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据