4.7 Article

Nickel-cadmium batteries with pocket electrodes as hydrogen energy storage units of high-capacity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102597

关键词

Hydrogen storage; Battery; Nickel-cadmium; Carbon material; Graphite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the hydrogen accumulation in the pocket electrodes of Ni-Cd batteries and their storage energy density, with experimental validation. The results show that the hydrogen storage capacity of the oxide-nickel electrode exceeds previous studies and DOE requirements, and factors affecting hydrogen accumulation vary when using graphite as the electrode active material.
In this paper, the hydrogen accumulation was studied in the pocket electrodes of the Ni-Cd batteries during their operation. The gravimetric capacity of the active substance of the oxide-nickel electrode was found to be equal to 22 wt% and its volumetric capacity to 444.2 kg m(-3). The results obtained are 4 times higher than previously obtained results in the world for any reversible metal hydrides and nanostructure carbon materials, as well as the requirements of the US Department of Energy for mobile hydrogen storage systems. The total energy density of the hydrogen stored in the active substance of the oxide-nickel electrode was equal to 79.40 kJ g(-1) and 160.24 kJ cm(-3). Note that the relevant parameters for the gasoline are 46 kJ g(-1) and 32.7 kJ cm(-3). The relevant specific capacities of the active substance of the cadmium electrode were found to be equal to 16.9 wt%, 404.4 kg m(-3), while the total energy density of the hydrogen stored in the active substance of the cadmium electrode was equal to 60.99 kJ g(-1) and 145.80 kJ cm(-3). In this paper also, the reasons for such a large hydrogen storage capacity were established experimentally. The effect of a number of factors on the hydrogen accumulation was analyzed in the case of active substance with graphite use for the electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据