4.7 Article

Tracing dust input to the global ocean using thorium isotopes in marine sediments: ThoroMap

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1526-1541

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016GB005408

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Council Canada (NSERC)
  2. FP7-PEOPLE-IEF, Marie Curie proposal [622483]
  3. US National Science Foundation [AGS-1003505, 1003509]
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1003509] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continental dust input into the ocean-atmosphere system has significant ramifications for biogeochemical cycles and global climate, yet direct observations of dust deposition in the ocean remain scarce. The long-lived isotope thorium-232 (Th-232) is greatly enriched in upper continental crust compared to oceanic crust and mid-ocean ridge basalt-like volcanogenic material. In open ocean sediments, away from fluvial and ice-rafted sources of continental material, Th-232 is often assumed to be of predominantly eolian origin. In conjunction with flux normalization based on the particle reactive radioisotope thorium-230 (Th-230), Th-232 measurements in marine sediments are a promising proxy for dust accumulation in the modern and past ocean. Here we present ThoroMap, a new global data compilation of Th-230-normalized fluxes of Th-232. After careful screening, we derive dust deposition estimates in the global ocean averaged for the late Holocene (0-4 ka) and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 19-23 ka). ThoroMap is compared with dust deposition estimates derived from the Community Climate System Model (CCSM3) and CCSM4, two coupled atmosphere, land, ocean, and sea ice models. Model-data correlation factors are 0.63 (CCSM3) and 0.59 (CCSM4) in the late Holocene and 0.82 (CCSM3) and 0.83 (CCSM4) in the LGM. ThoroMap is the first compilation that is built on a single, specific proxy for dust and that exclusively uses flux-normalization to derive dust deposition rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据