4.6 Review

Mechanisms of Cotranslational Protein Maturation in Bacteria

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.689755

关键词

protein folding; chaperone recognition; nascent chain processing; cotranslational assembly; ribosomal exit tunnel; trigger factor; DnaK

资金

  1. Heidelberg Biosciences International Graduate School (HBIGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing cells dedicate a significant part of their biosynthetic capacity to producing proteins, which must undergo various processes for proper functionality. Integration of translation with protein maturation processes is crucial for efficient and accurate protein synthesis. The interplay of ribosomes, chaperones, and other factors during cotranslational protein maturation guides the sequential events and coupling with protein complex assembly.
Growing cells invest a significant part of their biosynthetic capacity into the production of proteins. To become functional, newly-synthesized proteins must be N-terminally processed, folded and often translocated to other cellular compartments. A general strategy is to integrate these protein maturation processes with translation, by cotranslationally engaging processing enzymes, chaperones and targeting factors with the nascent polypeptide. Precise coordination of all factors involved is critical for the efficiency and accuracy of protein synthesis and cellular homeostasis. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge on cotranslational protein maturation, with a focus on the production of cytosolic proteins in bacteria. We describe the role of the ribosome and the chaperone network in protein folding and how the dynamic interplay of all cotranslationally acting factors guides the sequence of cotranslational events. Finally, we discuss recent data demonstrating the coupling of protein synthesis with the assembly of protein complexes and end with a brief discussion of outstanding questions and emerging concepts in the field of cotranslational protein maturation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据