期刊
DERMATOLOGY AND THERAPY
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1657-1665出版社
ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-021-00585-x
关键词
Enstilar foam; Modified Psoriasis Area Severity Index; Physician Global Assessment; Proactive management; Reactive management; Time to first relapse
类别
资金
- LEO Pharma, Ballerup, Denmark
- Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
In the PSO LONG study, all patients benefited from long-term PM versus RM with Cal/BD foam regardless of baseline characteristics, and the benefit of treatment increased with greater disease severity.
Introduction The phase 3 PSO LONG study (NCT02899962) demonstrated superior efficacy of proactive (PM) versus reactive management (RM) using calcipotriene 0.005%/betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) foam in adults with psoriasis. Here, we evaluated whether certain baseline parameters had an effect on time to first relapse (TTFR), number of relapses, and assessed interactions between treatment effect. Methods PSO LONG included an initial 4-week open-label phase (once-daily Cal/BD foam) and a 52-week maintenance phase where patients were randomized to twice-weekly Cal/BD (PM) or vehicle foam (RM), with a 4-week once-daily Cal/BD foam rescue treatment for relapse. Baseline parameters analyzed using a stepwise variable selection procedure included body surface area, modified Psoriasis Area Severity Index (mPASI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), body mass index, age, sex, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and duration of psoriasis. Continuous variables were divided into groups based on standard criteria. Results Overall, the effect of treatment on TTFR did not vary across any baseline parameters. Variables with a statistically significant effect on TTFR were: treatment group (PM vs. RM hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56; p < 0.001); PGA (moderate vs. mild HR: 1.42; severe vs. mild HR: 2.32; overall p = 0.009); mPASI (moderate vs. mild HR: 1.19; severe vs. mild HR: 1.77; overall p = 0.009); and sex (women vs. men HR: 1.26; p = 0.030). Variables with a significant effect on the number of relapses were: treatment group (PM vs. RM, rate ratio [RR] 0.52; p < 0.001); PGA at baseline (moderate vs. mild, RR 1.38; severe vs. mild, RR 2.22; overall p < 0.001); and mPASI (moderate vs. mild, RR 1.25; severe vs. mild, HR 1.70; overall p = 0.002). Conclusion All patients benefitted from long-term PM versus RM with Cal/BD foam regardless of baseline characteristics, and the benefit of treatment increased with greater disease severity.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据