4.7 Article

New Sequential and Parallel Support Vector Machine with Grey Wolf Optimizer for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

期刊

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 2520-2534

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.07.024

关键词

Machine learning; Support vector machine; Grey Wolf optimizer; Scaling techniques; Breast cancer; Parallel processing

资金

  1. Deanship of Sci-entific Research at Majmaah University [RGP-2019-29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a novel approach to improve breast cancer diagnosis accuracy, including enhancing support vector machine performance, introducing new scaling techniques, and utilizing parallel techniques to enhance efficiency.
Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. Early detection of cancer increases the probability of recovery. This work has three contributions. The first contribution is improving the performance of support vector machine (SVM) using a recent grey wolf optimizer (GWO) for diagnosis breast cancer with efficient scaling techniques. The second contribution is proposing three efficient scaling techniques against the classical normalization technique. The last contribution is using a parallel technique which applies task distribution to improve the efficiency of GWO. The proposed sequential model is applied on two different datasets, Wisconsin diagnosis breast cancer (WDBC) dataset and Electronic Health Records (EHR). Experimental results of WDBC show that the proposed hybrid GWO-SVM model achieves 98.60% with normalization scaling. Also, using the proposed scaling techniques with the proposed GWO-SVM model gives a fast convergence and achieves accuracy rate by 99.30%. The parallel version of the proposed model achieves a speedup by 3.9 on four CPU cores. On the other hand, Experimental results of EHR show that the proposed hybrid GWO-SVM model achieves 93.26% with normalization scaling against 82.05 for SVM. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据