4.6 Article

The role of forest fire severity on vegetation recovery after 18 years. Implications for forest management of Quercus suber L. in Iberian Peninsula

期刊

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 11-16

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.07.016

关键词

Pinus pinaster ssp.; Quercus suber L.; Forest abandonment; Forest management; Plant species inventory

资金

  1. POSTFIRE Project - Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2013-47862-C2-1, CGL2013-47862-C2-R]
  2. FPU Program by the Ministry of Economy, Culture and Sports [FPU 014/00037]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR825]
  4. POSTFIRE Project - Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2013-47862-C2-1, CGL2013-47862-C2-R]
  5. FPU Program by the Ministry of Economy, Culture and Sports [FPU 014/00037]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wildfires are a widespread phenomenon in Mediterranean environments. Wildfires result in different fire severities, and then in contrasting plant cover and floristic composition. This paper analyses the recovery of the vegetation eighteen years after a wildfire in Catalonia. The Pinus pinaster ssp. forest was affected by three different severities in July 1994, and studied the spring of 1995 and again in 2008. After eighteen years (2012), our research found that burnt sites constitute a dense forest with a broad variety of species, including many young pines, shrubs and herbaceous plants, but that the risk of fire remains very high, due to the large quantity of fuel and the flammability of the species. The management of the post-fire is critical when high severity fires take places, and it is recommended that high-severity fires must be avoided for a sustainable forest management. We recommend that once the timber (Pinus plantations) production is not profitable, Quercus suber L. and Pinus pinaster ssp. forest should be promoted, and pine plantations avoided. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据