4.6 Article

Clinical Outcomes of Immunocompromised Adults Hospitalized with Pneumococcal Pneumonia: A Case-Control Study

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9081746

关键词

immunocompromised host; streptococcus pneumoniae; community-acquired pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to define the clinical presentation and outcomes of immunocompromised adults (ICA) hospitalized with pneumococcal pneumonia (PP) and compare the data to non-immunocompromised adults (non-ICA) hospitalized with PP. The results showed that in hospitalized patients with PP receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy, the presence of an abnormal immune system did not significantly impact clinical outcomes.
S. pneumoniae is a primary etiologic agent of CAP in immunocompromised adults (ICA). Data on clinical outcomes of ICA hospitalized with pneumococcal pneumonia (PP) is limited. The objectives of this study were (1) to define clinical presentation and outcomes of ICA hospitalized with PP and (2) to compare the data to non-immunocompromised adults (non-ICA) hospitalized with PP. This was a case-control study of ICA hospitalized with PP (cases) and non-ICA hospitalized with PP (controls). Data were collected on clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Evaluated clinical outcomes included time to clinical stability (TCS), length of hospitalization (LOH), clinical failure (CF), cardiovascular events (CE), and in-hospital mortality (IHM). One ICA was matched to two non-ICA through propensity score matching. A total of 93 ICA hospitalized with PP and 186 non-ICA hospitalized with PP were evaluated. Antibiotic therapy was appropriate in all patients. Clinical outcomes for ICA versus non-ICA were as follows: TCS 2 days vs. 2 days (p = 0.392); LOH 5 days vs. 5 days (p = 0.067); CF 4% vs. 6% (p = 0.618); CE 10% vs. 6% (p = 0.375); and IHM 5% vs. 3% (p = 0.296). In hospitalized patients with PP who are treated with appropriate antibiotic therapy, the presence of an abnormal immune system does influence clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据